<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best and worst #1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bloggingintothefuture.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/best-and-worst-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bloggingintothefuture.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/best-and-worst-1/</link>
	<description>A blog among blogs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:01:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Anon Guy</title>
		<link>http://bloggingintothefuture.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/best-and-worst-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>The Anon Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 03:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingintothefuture.wordpress.com/2007/10/12/best-and-worst-1/#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Actually, Dullard Mush is a political blog with an emphasis on Nevada.  It isn&#039;t a journalism/blogging-specific site, so not sure if it warrants a &quot;Worst&quot; (though I guess bad publicity is better than none).

The article referenced above was just a link to someone else discussing the topic.  It did, though, also link to a past journalism vs. blogging incident in which DM was involved (which I&#039;m not sure if you read).

That entailed a local reporter who covered candidates for his paper, as news stories not opinion, but also maintained a personal blog that was highly partisan.  He also threatened another blogger and tipped off a candidate friend of his to a possible investigation.

The topic of whether a supposed unbiased reporter could also run a partisan blog on the side and not hurt the integrity of their stories and paper prompted an interesting comment thread on a UNR journalism blog.  I also solicited opinions from other journalism experts.

In the end, most thought it was a bad idea and a few suggested it was a disgrace to journalism and the offending reporter should be fired. And after his actions were exposed by a few blogs, he was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Dullard Mush is a political blog with an emphasis on Nevada.  It isn&#8217;t a journalism/blogging-specific site, so not sure if it warrants a &#8220;Worst&#8221; (though I guess bad publicity is better than none).</p>
<p>The article referenced above was just a link to someone else discussing the topic.  It did, though, also link to a past journalism vs. blogging incident in which DM was involved (which I&#8217;m not sure if you read).</p>
<p>That entailed a local reporter who covered candidates for his paper, as news stories not opinion, but also maintained a personal blog that was highly partisan.  He also threatened another blogger and tipped off a candidate friend of his to a possible investigation.</p>
<p>The topic of whether a supposed unbiased reporter could also run a partisan blog on the side and not hurt the integrity of their stories and paper prompted an interesting comment thread on a UNR journalism blog.  I also solicited opinions from other journalism experts.</p>
<p>In the end, most thought it was a bad idea and a few suggested it was a disgrace to journalism and the offending reporter should be fired. And after his actions were exposed by a few blogs, he was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
